Comments on: No oil for you! http://www.letterneversent.com/no-oil-for-you/867/ Tell me when to go. Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: DIRTY STEVE http://www.letterneversent.com/no-oil-for-you/867/comment-page-1/#comment-456 DIRTY STEVE Sun, 23 Feb 2003 12:47:43 +0000 http://www.letterneversent.com/index.php/archives/2003/02/05/no-oil-for-you/#comment-456 Does the curtness of your recent replies mean we're not friends anymore? Oh, yeah, does Scott know I'm over here? Does the curtness of your recent replies mean we’re not friends anymore? Oh, yeah, does Scott know I’m over here?

]]> By: DIRTY STEVE http://www.letterneversent.com/no-oil-for-you/867/comment-page-1/#comment-455 DIRTY STEVE Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:06:54 +0000 http://www.letterneversent.com/index.php/archives/2003/02/05/no-oil-for-you/#comment-455 Now, I hope that's not what you would call "well documented"! I'm not sure who Jonathan Wright is, and I'm not sure how accurate all of his information is. I'm a person who doesn't 100% believe anyone, whether it suits my needs or not. But if there were any further elaboration than some vague quotes in an article on the internet, I would be very interested. Reading that article and recalling what you said about it made me wonder how carefully YOU read it. But that's what I love about talking to you, Chris. We see the same things from totally different sides, and we've managed not to break down into childish name-calling. (except for that whole "wayward military", "candy-ass liberal" thing) Anyway, I'm not trying to have you do all the research for me, I just have barely enough time to post on your site as it is. Talk to you soon! Now, I hope that’s not what you would call “well documented”! I’m not sure who Jonathan Wright is, and I’m not sure how accurate all of his information is. I’m a person who doesn’t 100% believe anyone, whether it suits my needs or not. But if there were any further elaboration than some vague quotes in an article on the internet, I would be very interested. Reading that article and recalling what you said about it made me wonder how carefully YOU read it. But that’s what I love about talking to you, Chris. We see the same things from totally different sides, and we’ve managed not to break down into childish name-calling. (except for that whole “wayward military”, “candy-ass liberal” thing) Anyway, I’m not trying to have you do all the research for me, I just have barely enough time to post on your site as it is. Talk to you soon!

]]> By: chris http://www.letterneversent.com/no-oil-for-you/867/comment-page-1/#comment-454 chris Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:11:24 +0000 http://www.letterneversent.com/index.php/archives/2003/02/05/no-oil-for-you/#comment-454 It's right there: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=564&ncid=564&e=3&u=/nm/20030211/ts_nm/iraq_usa_planning_dc_2 It’s right there:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=564&ncid=564&e=3&u=/nm/20030211/ts_nm/iraq_usa_planning_dc_2

]]> By: DIRTY STEVE http://www.letterneversent.com/no-oil-for-you/867/comment-page-1/#comment-453 DIRTY STEVE Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:54:37 +0000 http://www.letterneversent.com/index.php/archives/2003/02/05/no-oil-for-you/#comment-453 I did not say we were a liberation force. Our intrest here is not one of liberation, but one of international "law enforcement". And as for the "well documented plans" you speak of, I am more than willing to entertain discussion. I am unaware of any such plans. If you could steer me to the place that such plans could be found, I would like to review them for myself. After all, what do I know, Im only HERE.;p I did not say we were a liberation force. Our intrest here is not one of liberation, but one of international “law enforcement”. And as for the “well documented plans” you speak of, I am more than willing to entertain discussion. I am unaware of any such plans. If you could steer me to the place that such plans could be found, I would like to review them for myself. After all, what do I know, Im only HERE.;p

]]>