http://www.letterneversent.com/the-problem-of-paul/179/ Tell me when to go. Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.letterneversent.com/the-problem-of-paul/179/comment-page-1/#comment-149051 Christine Flaherty Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:13:00 +0000 http://www.letterneversent.com/index.php/archives/2002/02/22/the-problem-of-paul/#comment-149051 Sounds interesting I’ll check out whatever you got. Thanks for that great post. Very educational. Sounds interesting I’ll check out whatever you got. Thanks for that great post. Very educational.

]]> http://www.letterneversent.com/the-problem-of-paul/179/comment-page-1/#comment-149050 Reyjacobs Thu, 22 Sep 2011 04:47:00 +0000 http://www.letterneversent.com/index.php/archives/2002/02/22/the-problem-of-paul/#comment-149050 If by Christianity you mean justification by faith alone....its all Paul and Paul alone. If by Christianity you mean justification by faith alone….its all Paul and Paul alone.

]]> http://www.letterneversent.com/the-problem-of-paul/179/comment-page-1/#comment-149049 Reyjacobs Thu, 22 Sep 2011 04:40:00 +0000 http://www.letterneversent.com/index.php/archives/2002/02/22/the-problem-of-paul/#comment-149049 The problem isn't so much Paul as the churchmen who put his epistles into Scripture, and the moron Protestants who removed the apocrypha but kept Paul. The problem isn’t so much Paul as the churchmen who put his epistles into Scripture, and the moron Protestants who removed the apocrypha but kept Paul.

]]> http://www.letterneversent.com/the-problem-of-paul/179/comment-page-1/#comment-35 Chris Joyce Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:56:08 +0000 http://www.letterneversent.com/index.php/archives/2002/02/22/the-problem-of-paul/#comment-35 Oops, that should be "lilies of the field". No proofread, no eat. Oops, that should be “lilies of the field”. No proofread, no eat.

]]>