06
Oct 02

A Must Read Article

Oil has always been top of Bush’s foreign-policy agenda:


    October 7 2002

    As the United States prepares for war with Iraq, a report commissioned early in George Bush’s presidency has surfaced, showing that the US knew it was running out of oil and foreshadowing the possible need for military intervention to secure supplies.

    The report forecasts an end to cheap and plentiful fuel, with the energy industry facing “the beginning of capacity limitations”.

    Prepared by the influential Washington-based Council on Foreign Relations and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, it urged the Bush Administration to admit “these agonising truths to the American people”.

    Strategic Energy Policy Challenges for the 21st Century, written early last year, was a policy document used to shape the new administration’s energy policy.

    It applauded the creation of Vice-President Dick Cheney’s energy task force to address the creation of specific energy plans, and suggested it consider including representation from the Department of Defence.

    Saying “there is no alternative” and “there is no time to waste”, the document projects periods of exploding US energy prices, economic recession and social unrest unless answers are found.

    It suggests that a minimum three to five years is needed to find a solution, and says a “reassessment of the role of energy in American foreign policy” is called for, with access to oil repeatedly cited as a “security imperative”.

    The involvement of the Council of Foreign Relations in the report’s preparation adds weight to its findings. The council ranks as one of the most influential groups in US political circles, with members including Mr Cheney and the former secretaries of state Henry Kissinger and James Baker.

    The report also explodes the myth that the US is insulated from Middle East oil supply problems because it receives the bulk of its oil from less volatile sources outside the Persian Gulf. It says Middle East pricing and supply trends “will affect energy costs around the globe regardless”.

Continue reading →


06
Oct 02

Pope canonises Opus Dei founder


Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer’s canonization, only 27 years after the Spanish priest’s death, was achieved in remarkably swift time by the Vatican’s saint-making timetables, which often stretch over decades or even centuries. …

Many of Opus Dei’s members come from top professional ranks, including law, medicine, publishing and other businesses.

The many suits and ties, conservative dresses and string pearls worn by the faithful to the ceremony reflected the rather upscale membership of much of the organisation. ….

Opus Dei has rejected charges that it is elitist and secretive, and much of the criticism of Escriva’s personality seemed to be tempered as Catholics saw the pope move along Escriva’s cause for sainthood at a quick pace.


05
Oct 02

Attack On Iraq Likely To Begin October 9, 2002

From here:


    After weeks of media blitz and diplomatic efforts the United States is all set to launch attack on the beleaguered Iraq on October 9, highly credible diplomatic sources disclosed to The Frontier Post here Wednesday. …

    Special US emissaries have already taken rulers of governments of Middle East region in confidence by sharing the intended date of US attack on their isolated neighbour. While their stationed diplomatic staff is doing hectic diplomatic lobbying to tone down the general public anger against the naked US aggression against Iraq, they added. The main agenda of US attack is to eliminate President Saddam Hussain and to install a pro US regime in Baghdad.

    The first sorties of US Air Force flying from their near by stationed aircraft carriers would go for bombing the presidential palace and other safe houses of Saddam Hussain. If their initial plan, some how failed then intense bombing of the military and other strategic installations would be done leading to an internal revolt would be staged by US loyal people for the ouster of Saddam loyal regime they said.


03
Oct 02

Is this what war is supposed to be like?

The ‘war’ news is really strange. For example, from an article in the NY Times:


    Washington, on the other hand, is trying to resolve the issue of Iraq’s compliance with inspections as quickly as possible so that if it comes to war, military action can be taken this winter. If the inspections are stymied, as the White House expects, the United States would be able to attack when the cooler temperatures make it easier for American troops to operate in bulky chemical gear and the longer nights enable them to take advantage of their night vision equipment.

It just points out how this is more like a gang dispute rather than a ‘war’. Bush and the rest of Hell’s choir spout slogans and belligerence against Iraq, but yet they engage in this invasion as if it were part of their business plan. Isn’t the nature of war that something presents itself as an immediate danger to your people and you fight that threat? As Clausewitz wrote, “War is politics by other means.” It is all power politics and economics.

We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. – George Orwell, 1984


03
Oct 02

Is Bush yella?

I thought this was pretty funny.

BBC: Bush challenged to ‘duel’ with Saddam:


    “Bush wants to attack the whole [of] Iraq, the army and the infrastructure,” the Iraqi vice-president said.

    “The American president should specify a group, and we will specify a group and choose neutral ground with Kofi Annan as referee and use one weapon with a president against a president, a vice-president against a vice-president, and a minister against a minister in a duel.”

    Mr Fleischer poured scorn on the proposal saying:

    “In the past when Iraq had disputes, it invaded its neighbours. There were no duels; there were invasions. There was use of weapons of mass destruction and military. That’s how Iraq settles its disputes.”

Bush is a wuss. He talks a big talk when other people’s lives are on the line, but his blue blood is a little too precious.


26
Sep 02

Military seeks to control riots with calming drugs

From the Houston Chronicle:


    WASHINGTON — The U.S. military is exploring ways to use drugs such as Valium to calm people without killing them during riots or other crowd control situations where lethal weapons are inappropriate.

    Some critics say the effort violates international treaties and federal laws against chemical weapons, an allegation the military denies.

    “It’s a rotten idea to drug rioters,” said Edward Hammond of the Sunshine Project, a chemical and biological weapons watchdog group that is the program’s chief critic. “Beyond being a horrible idea, it’s illegal.”

    The Pentagon has long tried to develop nonlethal weapons that would incapacitate or repel people with little risk of killing them. The effort intensified in the 1990s after hostile mobs confronted U.S. troops during peacekeeping and humanitarian missions in places like Somalia, Bosnia and Haiti.


25
Sep 02

American ‘Peace’ under the American boot

Bush’s puppet masters have outlined their manifesto for the so-called ‘Pax Americana’ recalling the ‘Pax Romana’ of the Roman Empire. Despots with a global aim have often linked themselves to the Romans. Napolean had himself crowned emperor, the tsars of Russia and the kaisers of Germany took their titles from the Roman Caesars. Hitler and the Third Reich used Roman-style standards and banners as well as the traditional Roman imperial salute, the outstretched arm. Hail Caesar! Sig Heil! The Fourth Reich may well be the American Reich, the one world government, the New World Order. What you are seeing is the corruption of the principles which our government is supposed to represent. The parasites in the Bush administration talk about other governments engaging in the ‘appeasement’ of Iraq. They are trying to make the comparison between Hussein and Hitler, but the more apt comparison would be the appeasement of the United States by the governments of the world. While the US plots murder against the people of Iraq, the leaders of France, China, and Russia are making back room deals to get what they want out of this farce.

Manifesto for world dictatorship By Margo Kingston


    Now we know. The Americans have spelt it out in black and white. There will be a world government, but not one even pretending to be comprised of representatives of its nation states through the United Nations. The United States will rule, and not according to painstakingly developed international law and norms, but by what is in its interests.

    In declaring itself dictator of the world, The United States will have no accountability to non-United States citizens. It will bomb who it likes when it likes, and change regimes when and as it sees fit, it will not be subject to investigations for war crimes, for torture, or for breaches of fundamental human rights.

    When it asks the United Nations to move against Iraq, it is not demanding agreement to a strong case for action. It now admits it has no evidence that Iraq is preapring to use weapons of mass destruction against any other country. The Americans have stopped pretending, and now demand outright capitulation to its hegemony. The world will be policed in American interests. Full stop.

  • NOT ONE ‘KILLER FACT’ IN IRAQ DOSSIER
  • More to Iraq war than just Saddam? US has wider strategic aims, says an international conference The impending war has much wider strategic aims such as the cementing of US global supremacy by removing any future threat to America’s oil supplies, encircling China, and installing US-friendly ‘democratic’ regimes across the Middle East.
  • Will Germany shift Iraq stance? Yes. They’ll fall in line behind our fuhrer.
  • The propaganda war done by the most expert of propagandists, the british. FIENDS’ TORTURE CHAMBERS (Regarding Hussein’s ‘torture chambers’). Remember the british propaganda during WWI about the German hun?
  • America’s Weapons of Mass Destruction
  • Uncle oSAMa Says: I Want YOU To Invade Iraq

  • 21
    Sep 02

    Pulling the anti-Semitism card

    From the NY Times:

    Harvard’s Pro-Israel, Jewish president, Lawrence H. Summers, has attempted to paint critics of Israel as anti-Semites. This is the sort of thing a person does when they are unable or unwilling to make a coherent argument and wish to stifle discussion. This came after many students and professors have called for Harvard to divest itself of all Israeli investments.

    Labeling the petition anti-Semitic is a strategy to detract from the criticisms of Israel,” Professor Spelke said. “It turns the substance of a political debate into a debate of morals and supposed racism.

    I thought the following portion contained an important omission:

    Lawrence S. Bacow, president of nearby Tufts University, applauded Mr. Summers for his stand. “University presidents ought to raise important questions and I think he has,” Mr. Bacow said, adding that he, too, was concerned about signs suggesting a rise in anti-Semitism on campuses.

    Regardless of how unimportant it may actually be, isn’t it at least noteworthy to mention that Lawrence Bacow is Jewish? Might that not factor into your appraisal of the situation? He is the only other University president quoted in the piece.


    20
    Sep 02

    Interesting information

    American Military Interventions of the 20th Century

    Please be aware that this listing does not include many, many U.S. “interventions” where U.S. troops were not the primary force – such as the U.S. intervention in the Greek civil war during the 1950s – nor does it include the many, many U.S. nuclear threats that one might well consider a form of intervention – such as the U.S. nuclear threat during the ’73 Arab-Israeli war – nor does it include many CIA organized war efforts, such as the long war against the leftist Angolan government which was waged by the U.S. and racist South Africa – nor does it include all the countries intervened/invaded by the U.S. in World War I and World War II.

    Related:

  • Department of Defense List of Military Installations Foreign