15
Jan 02

Realpolitik

realpolitik: n. (re·al·po·li·tik) (sometimes cap.) politics or national policy governed by principles of power, expansion, and expediency rather than by ideals or ethics.

  1. Central Asia: U.S. Military Buildup Shifts Spheres Of Influence
  2. America quietly changes war aim
  3. Dismay With Saudi Arabia Fuels Pullout Talk The US won’t pullout unless the Saudis make them. We’ve spent hundreds of billions of dollars building bases there.
  4. US defends their skirting of the Geneva Convention
  5. Spraying Poisonous Herbicides on Colombians: Your tax dollars at work. The US will be increasing assistance to the Colombian government against the FARC in the name of the ‘War on Drugs’. Sounds almost as funny as the ‘War Against Terrorism’.
  6. New Criticism Signals Tension Between U.S. and Russia
  7. Russia: No Need for Post-War U.S. Forces in C. Asia

15
Jan 02

Creating the Islamic Fundamentalist Threat

From The “Green Peril”:
Creating the Islamic Fundamentalist Threat
a policy analysis by Leon Hamar of the Cato institute written in August 1992 after the Gulf War and at the end of the first Bush administration. Some great points are made here. It’s a long read but very informative. Discovered via Cryptome:


    Now that the Cold War is becoming a memory, America’s
    foreign policy establishment has begun searching for new ene-
    mies. Possible new villains include “instability” in Europe
    –ranging from German resurgence to new Russian imperialism–
    the “vanishing” ozone layer, nuclear proliferation, and
    narcoterrorism. Topping the list of potential new global
    bogeymen, however, are the Yellow Peril, the alleged threat
    to American economic security emanating from East Asia, and
    the so-called Green Peril (green is the color of Islam).
    That peril is symbolized by the Middle Eastern Moslem funda-
    mentalist–the “Fundie,” to use a term coined by The Econo-
    mist(1)–a Khomeini-like creature, armed with a radical ideolo-
    gy, equipped with nuclear weapons, and intent on launching a
    violent jihad against Western civilization. …

    The Islam vs. West paradigm, reflected in such observa-
    tions, is beginning to infect Washington. That development
    recalls the efforts by some of Washington’s iron triangles
    as well as by foreign players during the months leading up
    to the 1990-91 Persian Gulf crisis. Their use of the media
    succeeded in building up Saddam Hussein as the “most danger-
    ous man in the world”(6) and as one of America’s first new
    post-Cold War bogeymen. Those efforts, including allega-
    tions that Iraq had plans to dominate the Middle East,
    helped to condition the American public and elites for the
    U.S. intervention in the gulf.(7) …

    The problem with that campaign is that the legitimacy
    of the Saudi regime is based on its own Islamic fundamental-
    ist principles. The Saudi government is actually more rigid
    in its application of Islamic law and more repressive in
    many respects than the one in Tehran. For example, Saudi
    Arabia has no form of popular representation, and political
    rights are totally denied women and non-Moslems. The Saudi
    regime has been able to stay in power largely because it has
    had both direct and indirect American military support, most
    recently during the Gulf War. To paraphrase President
    Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Saudis are Islamic fundamental-
    ists–but they are our Islamic fundamentalists.(30) …

    Indeed, the Bush administration’s response to the Alge-
    rian coup is only the most recent manifestation of a policy
    that subordinates the political will of Middle Eastern popu-
    lations to the preservation of a profoundly undemocratic
    status quo. In the name of combating the elusive threat of
    Islamic fundamentalism, which has emerged as one of the most
    important engines of change in the region, the United States
    allies itself with some of the most anti-democratic forces
    there.

I could quote selections all day. Hadar does provide a superb amount of information and from our point of view of a decade later his analysis is right on in most respects.


14
Jan 02

The Good War?

PBS is showing a documentary this week called The Good War and Those Who Refused to Fight It. It’s about people who refused the draft during World War 2 because of their pacifist beliefs.


    Millions of American soldiers fought for the liberation of Europe from Hitler’s fascist grip during World War II.
    Yet 40,000 Americans refused to shoulder weapons in ‘the good war’ because their consciences would not allow them to kill another human being.
    In the face of criticism and scorn, these men challenged the limits of democracy in wartime. Manu participated in the social movements that transformed America in the years that followed. This is their story.”

I’m going to need to tape that. Looks good.


14
Jan 02

A Reader Points Out

A reader sent some good links on Otto Reich for some reason or another they were not created as links in the comment section so I am posting some of them here. Thanks for sending them in:

  1. Who is Otto Reich?
  2. Otto Reich’s Dirty Laundry
  3. Stop Otto Reich
  4. Public Information Research’s Reich links
  5. The American Prospect
    “Our Man in Little Havana:”

13
Jan 02

Labor Myths and the Facts

As anyone who has worked blue-collar jobs knows corporations and management are often rabidly anti-union. In my experience I have worked in jobs where even saying the ‘u’ word can get you in serious trouble. The neanderthals in management openly expressed their hatred and animosity for unions and often spouted completely illogical and misinformed arguments against organized labor. The AFL-CIO website is good for countering this sort of attitude as it presents rebuttals to all the standard slogans and arguments. From a section of the AFL-CIO website, Working America: Setting the Record Straight:

    Myth:

    We have lower unionization in the United States than in other countries, but those other countries, especially in Europe, have a lot higher unemployment.

    Fact:

    Our unemployment rate looks good because of the way we measure unemployment.

    We don’t count people working part-time who want full-time jobs. We, also, don’t count people who cannot take jobs because they lack child care or transportation to get to jobs. If we include those people our rate is 9.6%, which is about the European average. Don’t forget, in the United States you are counted as employed if you work as little as one hour in a week for wages.


12
Jan 02

Pork

While corporations get billions and billions in ‘tax-rebates’ from the Bush economic stimulus plan ($256 million for Enron alone) companies like Ford Motors are slashing 35,000 jobs. I’m glad we have our priorities straight. There was this idiotic commentator from the Financial Times or some other such rag on Morning Edition the other day. Her position was that layoffs are a necessary expression of the freedom that business must have so that they can cut costs and then create more jobs in the future! She called it something like the freedom to fire to hire. I’m guessing she’s not taking into account that the manufacturing sector has largely been moved out of the country where the same items can be made by people who have none of the protections of American labor law. These same items are then shipped back to the US where they are sold for the same price. This is a result of the never-ending demand of higher profits. Consumers do not benefit, workers do not benefit, communities do not benefit. It is only those who trade in stock and the barons who run the companies who benefit from the increased profits. Profits which have increased greatly while wages and benefits have fallen. Workers are expected to provide for their own retirements while their wages drop below 1968 levels if adjusted for inflation.


12
Jan 02

The Florida Payoff

Bush has decided to go forward with the controversial recess appointments of Otto Juan Reich and Eugene Scalia. Recess appointments are often used to avoid negative publicity and scrutiny. Clinton also practiced this game. These appointments are clearly a deliberate signal to players influential in providing assistance to the Bush presidential takeover and court battle in the 2000 election. Otto Reich was a propagandist for the Reagan administration otto reich who was involved in covertly planting domestic propaganda. He would write op-ed pieces in major newspapers under the names of Contra leaders. He also planted government propaganda by groups he created and controlled like the example here by ‘The Young Republicans’. As a ‘Cuban exile’, he is also a darling of the anti-Castro, conservative Cuban-American set which is influential in Florida politics. Bush clearly wants to throw them a bone for a job well done in Florida. (Get more info on Otto Reich from his file at the National Security Archive)

Eugene Scalia is the son of Justice Antonin Scalia who ruled in favor of Bush during the Bush vs. Gore case before the US Supreme Court. Eugene Scalia’s lawfirm also supported Bush during his Supreme Court case. So, you have Justice Scalia hearing testimony from the lawyers who work closely with his son?! Of course, most ‘conservatives’ will deny any link here. They are as innocent as lambs.

    Two of Scalia’s nine children are connected with law firms representing Bush.

    • Eugene Scalia, 37, is a partner in the Washington office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, where Bush lawyer Theodore Olson also is a partner.
    • John Scalia, 35, has accepted a job offer with the Washington office of Greenberg Traurig. Another Bush lawyer, Barry S. Richard, is a partner in that firm’s Tallahassee office.

The Bush administration’s stripes are showing. I’m eager to see what other things will turn up.


12
Jan 02

Guant�namo Bay

The US military has moved some Taleban prisoners to the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba. To get around protections associated with the Geneva Convention the United States is distinguishing the prisoners as “unlawful combatants”. Even though they will be kept in outdoor wire cages they will be allowed the luxury of practicing their religion.

    “Unlawful combatants do not have any rights under the Geneva Convention,” Mr. Rumsfeld said. “We have indicated that we do plan to, for the most part, treat them in a manner that is reasonably consistent with the Geneva Conventions, to the extent they are appropriate.”

Apparently, the United States military does not like abiding by international agreements. I saw a grainy photo of a hooded and manacled prisoner. It looked pretty inhumane like how you would imagine someone prepared for execution. It’s funny, in World War II even the Nazis followed the Geneva Convention.

I’m wondering why the US has decided to send the POWs to Guantanamo Bay. Does anyone else think it is weird that we have a military base in a country with which we have supported coups and sanctions of? What kind of message is this sending to the Cuba people? Of course, the Cubans are not happy about this. Some Cubans think the United States is seizing the opportunity to buildup its forces in Cuba without triggering suspicions of aggression. They may be right. I don’t think Americans would be happy if there were a Japanese base on our soil or a Cuban military base on our soil. Why is our military all over the world in other people’s countries even when the people of those countries want them out?


11
Jan 02

Rall on the Afghan Connection

I CAN SEE CLEARLY NOW THE PAIN IS GONE: by Ted Rall

    “As Zalmay Khalilzad co-wrote in The Washington Quarterly in its Winter 2000 issue, “Afghanistan could prove a valuable corridor for this [Caspian Sea] energy as well as for access to markets in Central Asia.” Khalilzad has an unsavory past. As a State and Defense Department official during the Reagan years, Khalilzad helped supply the anti-Soviet mujihadeen with weapons they’re now using to fight Americans. During the `90s he worked as Unocal’s chief consultant on its Afghan pipeline scheme….”

    “…Did Bush exploit the September 11th attacks to justify a Central Asian oil grab? The answer seems clear. On December 31, Bush appointed his special envoy to Afghanistan: Zalmay Khalilzad. “This is a moment of opportunity for Afghanistan,” the former Unocal employee commented upon arrival in Kabul January 5. You bet it is: Pakistan’s Frontier Post reports that U.S. ambassador Wendy Chamberlain met in October with Pakistan’s oil minister to discuss reviving the Unocal project.”