19
Mar 03

Aramchek.org

I’m working on a new site for a new project involving my return to drawing. The idea is I’ll be working on some subversive allegorical comic strips. The idea isn’t fully realized yet, but I’ve been wanting to start something inspired by current events. It will take a lot of work. I’ve got the domain name ‘aramchek.org’ finally after the previous owner let it lapse and notified me so I could register it. I’ve got a tiny page up right now with nothing on it of real interest. If I can muster enough initiative I’ll have some drawings up fairly soon.

Why the name Aramchek and what does it mean? For more information visit this previous post I made on the subject.


19
Mar 03

Iraq Must Not Be Occupied,

  • Iraq Must Not Be Occupied, Says Fahd: “We expect the war to end the moment UN Security Council Resolution 1441 to disarm (Iraq) of weapons of mass destruction has been implemented,” the king said. “We categorically refuse that the war affects Iraq’s unity, independence, resources and internal security or Iraq comes under military occupation. We have informed the United States of the clear Saudi position,” he added.
  • Guess who will be calling the shots at CNN: “All reporters preparing package scripts must submit the scripts for approval,” it says. “Packages may not be edited until the scripts are approved …. All packages originating outside Washington, LA or NY, including all international bureaus, must come to the ROW in Atlanta for approval. The date of this extraordinary message is Jan. 27. “ROW” is the row of script editors in Atlanta who can insist on changes or “balances” in dispatches. A script is not approved for air unless it is properly marked approved by an authorized manager …. When a script is updated it must be re-approved, preferably by the originating approving authority.”
  • Looming war on Iraq condemned: Germany’s Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer, said his country “emphatically rejects the impending war” – a sentiment echoed by his French counterpart Dominique de Villepin, who said the use of force would only exacerbate international terrorism.
  • The president’s real goal in Iraq: This war, should it come, is intended to mark the official emergence of the United States as a full-fledged global empire, seizing sole responsibility and authority as planetary policeman. It would be the culmination of a plan 10 years or more in the making, carried out by those who believe the United States must seize the opportunity for global domination, even if it means becoming the “American imperialists” that our enemies always claimed we were.
  • Still missing: how many Iraqis died in 1991 Gulf war?: A higher number was arrived at by Beth Daponte, now a research professor at Carnegie Mellon University. In 1992 she found herself at the centre of a political storm when, as a demographer in the Commerce Department, her estimate that 158,000 Iraqis died in the war and its aftermath became public. In 1993, having left government service, she raised this figure to 205,500. The largest component was 110,000 deaths attributable to illness in the immediate postwar period: 74,000 more children dying than normally would have done.She estimated 35,000 people died in postwar unrest(other estimates put this figure at least twice as high) and 3,500 civilians were killed in the bombing.
  • Is Iran Next? This Senate Resolution, Suggests It May Be

  • 19
    Mar 03

    Metaphor and War, Again: One

  • Metaphor and War, Again: One of the most central metaphors in our foreign policy is that A Nation Is A Person. It is used hundreds of times a day, every time the nation of Iraq is conceptualized in terms of a single person, Saddam Hussein. The war, we are told, is not being waged against the Iraqi people, but only against this one person. Ordinary American citizens are using this metaphor when they say things like, “Saddam is a tyrant. He must be stopped.” What the metaphor hides, of course, is that the 3000 bombs to be dropped in the first two days will not be dropped on that one person. They will kill many thousands of the people hidden by the metaphor, people that according to the metaphor we are not going to war against.
  • Media giant’s rally sponsorship raises questions: In a move that has raised eyebrows in some legal and journalistic circles, Clear Channel radio stations in Atlanta, Cleveland, San Antonio, Cincinnati and other cities have sponsored rallies attended by up to 20,000 people. The events have served as a loud rebuttal to the more numerous but generally smaller anti-war rallies.

    The sponsorship of large rallies by Clear Channel stations is unique among major media companies, which have confined their activities in the war debate to reporting and occasionally commenting on the news. The San Antonio-based broadcaster owns more than 1,200 stations in 50 states and the District of Columbia.

  • US warns Turkey to stay out of Iraq: The White House has publicly warned the Turkish Government not to let its troops enter Iraq, amid growing concerns that Turkey may try to confront pro-US Kurdish rebels in the opening stages of the Iraqi war. Any move by Turkey at that point would be a big complication for President George Bush. White House spokesman Ari Fleischer confirmed the US warning to the Turkish Government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. “It has been made clear that no outside forces other than coalition command should enter Iraq,” Mr Fleischer said.
  • Fighting near Basra: British and American troops were involved in fierce fighting near Iraq’s main port today as the war to topple Saddam Hussein began. The firefight broke out near Basra as men of the Special Boat Service targeted the strategically vital city and the oilfields in southern Iraq. At the same time allied troops were flooding into the demilitarised zone on the Iraqi border with Kuwait 40 miles away to take up positions for an all-out invasion.
  • Turkey exerts right to put troops in Iraq: Any Turkish measure allowing a U.S. deployment in Turkey would almost certainly authorize Turkish troops to enter northern Iraq as well. But in a three-hour meeting Tuesday, U.S. and Kurdish officials warned that a unilateral Turkish incursion could lead to fighting between Turkish troops and their own and could prompt other neighboring countries, such as Iran and Syria, to send forces into Iraq, according to officials who participated in the talks. But Turkey was unmoved, and continued to reserve its right to enter northern Iraq to protect its national security.
  • EU investigates mystery buggings: European Union officials have launched an investigation after bugging devices were found at offices used by several delegations – including those of France, Germany and the UK.

  • 19
    Mar 03

    Iraq Body Count

    At the risk of seeming too macabre I’ve posted an Iraq civilian body count counter on the bottom left of this page. You can get your own here. I hope no one else is killed and I wish the Iraqi people luck in the coming months and years. I’m surprised and yet not surprised that we are going against world opinion to wage this unnecessary, wasteful, and costly war. For our own sake as a nation founded upon principles of freedom, I hope we fail utterly in our mission to occupy this country.

    Military regime in place to run Iraq after Saddam:


      According to British and American officials, the final touches are being made to the ambitious plan, which envisages deploying an entire civil administration to take over the running of Iraq, from healthcare to education and security.

      The Times has learnt that most of the key posts in the future Iraqi civil service will be held by former American generals, diplomats and aid workers, who will report directly to the Pentagon.

      The overall head of this de facto Iraqi government will be General Tommy Franks, the commander-in-chief of American and British forces that are now poised to invade the country. Until yesterday Britain’s role in planning for post-Saddam Iraq was kept secret, even though the special inter-ministerial Iraq Planning Unit was created two months ago. It is headed by Dominick Chilcott, a Foreign Office diplomat and former Royal Navy officer, who co-ordinates with officials from the Ministry of Defence and the Department for International Development.

      A Foreign Office official said that the existence of the unit was not revealed because they did “not want to give the impression that war was inevitable”. …

      British and American officials said yesterday that allied forces were bound by international law to take responsibility for running Iraq once the Baathist regime of President Saddam is overthrown. They insisted, however, that they would gladly hand over responsibility for civilian administration to the United Nations and ultimately to an elected Iraqi government once the situation had stabilised.

      US officials denied that there was any intention of installing a long-term military “maharajah” and envisage a brief, “necessary occupation” lasting “months”.

      Some Iraqis, probably drawn from exiled groups and figures inside the country, will initially be involved on a consultative basis. Later it is hoped that power will be transferred to an Iraqi Interim Authority.

      Nevertheless, it is clear that General Franks will become a modern version of General Douglas MacArthur, who defeated and later ran Japan after the Second World War.


    18
    Mar 03

    Look at what great friends I have

    Dru messaged me out of the blue today to tell me something:

    [18:57:17] her: Chris?
    [18:57:21] me: dru?
    [18:57:29] her: Pardon me for getting mushy…
    [18:57:34] her: but I’m so glad that I know you.
    [18:57:36] me: awww
    [18:57:39] her: Thanks.

    Isn’t she the best?


    18
    Mar 03

    Does it feel good

    …to live in the Fourth Reich? I hope you’re proud. Now let’s see that Sig Heil! It’s not the Jews now. It’s the Muslims. Will we have the equivalent Yellow Crescent patches that Muslims will be required to wear or carry on their person?

    Rights Groups Protest Jailing of Asylum Seekers: Element of Stepped-Up Homeland Security Called ‘Shocking’ :


      Civil-rights groups and immigration advocacy organizations are protesting one element in the government’s security procedures announced yesterday in anticipation of war in Iraq–a decision to jail asylum seekers from dozens of mostly Muslim nations while officials check out their claims of persecution in their home countries.

      The complaints rose as security was stepped up across the country today, with more federal agents assigned to U.S. borders, increased deployment of Coast Guard ships and aircraft at seaports, and health officials placed on special alert to watch for possible chemical or biological attack. Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge also asked many of the nation’s 50 governors to deploy the National Guard or state police at sensitive sites such as chemical plants and railroad bridges.

      In addition, on Monday evening at the same time as President Bush’s speech on war in Iraq, Ridge announced he was raising the nation’s threat alert level to orange or “high risk” because of the danger terrorists would retaliate for a U.S. invasion of Iraq.

      “It’s a shocking development,” Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim civil-rights group, said of the asylum policy. “Many asylum applications can take years. It seems unfair to put people in jail who are escaping persecution and who have done nothing wrong just because they are from certain countries.”


    18
    Mar 03

    Let the murder begin

    BBC: Timeline of Iraq Crisis:


    5:43 PM: White House declares US forces would enter Iraq even if Saddam Hussein obeys order to leave.

    Know this. The offer to let Saddam Hussein flee is a lie. Our leaders are liars, thieves, and despots. We owe no allegiance to them or their military. This is a black day.

    US invasion of Iraq ‘inevitable’: The United States says American forces will enter Iraq to search for weapons of mass destruction even if President Saddam Hussein complies with an ultimatum to leave.


    18
    Mar 03

    The familiar battle

    Since I’ve been posting again to metafilter, a collaborative community weblog, I’ve been reminded of the essential differences in opinion between people. I don’t really identify myself as a liberal or as a conservative, although in many ways because we live in a very conservative country I tend to reject the credulousness and nostalgia that conservatives have for a past that never really existed. A past where everyone was kind, white, and religious. In conservatism’s desire to return to the past or to maintain the status quo I see a fear of change and freedom (especially other people’s freedom) and a desire to believe in leaders. They often seem to feel attacked or besieged or in the minority, very defensive which makes them behave in a reactionary manner. That’s not to say that some liberals and apologists for the state do not possess these same qualities, but people of a conservative frame of mind seem to be very uniform in this feeling. Of course, I’m biased.


    17
    Mar 03

    Oh my

    Someone just left three identical spam messages on one of my posts. I hope this is not the start of a new form of intrusive advertising.


    17
    Mar 03

    Equilibrium

    I liked this movie, Equilibrium. I drove an hour to San Antonio with Amy a few months ago to see it. I thought it was a good action movie with a good anti-government, anti-authoritarian, pro-human, pro-freedom message. This guy here suggests the government squashed its release. Hmmmm.

  • Cool Equilibrium website with storyboards!