Beyond mess: Cluttering, anxieties linked:
“One of the feelings in states of depression is that you feel lethargic,” Huntley said, “so picking up after yourself or straightening up is way too much.”
Likewise, people with ADD know they have to sit down and pay the bills, but they are easily distracted and that keeps them from completing tasks. “People with ADD also have to keep their stuff out where it’s visible; otherwise, they forget it.”
The knowledge that the task must be tackled or the item must be tossed is lost on people with OCD, who cannot determine what to keep and what to eliminate. “They can’t remove it,” Huntley said. “There’s a great deal of difficulty about decisions: ‘Am I going to need this or not?’ It’s really labored. So they keep the stuff around while they’re making the decision.
My own feeling is that much of this is caused by a lack of purpose and a lack of sense of place. Human beings in this country have become too fragmented and overstimulated. It is harder to recharge and gain quiet and peace.
Personality Profiling: Shrink to Fit?: As more entrepreneurs use psychological testing to screen hires, psychologist Ben Dattner warns against putting too much weight on the results:
Ample research has shown that organizations are “strong” situations, and that situational variables — like, for instance, the demands of a person’s role, incentive structures, team norms, and organizational culture — are much better predictors of behavior than are individual attributes. In order to add explanatory value, tests should explain the impact of personality or style on behavior, and also the impact of behavior on performance. Establishing the link between personality or style and behavior is difficult enough — many studies are unable to establish any link between personality or style and actual performance. …
I think, in general, people have a predisposition to make personal, rather than situational, attributions for behavior. We are all susceptible to “the fundamental attribution error,” meaning that we discount situational factors when trying to explain why other people behave as they do. Personality tests therefore confirm what we have a natural tendency to believe — that individuals create and influence situations, not the other way around.
These tests are also memorable, simple, intuitive, and often confirm what we already know about ourselves and others, even if that knowledge is, to some extent, built on simplified, stereotype-like categories of personalities and styles. This type of classification of people is an integral part of American popular culture, marketing, and politics. Just as many of us use movie and television stars as points of reference when describing others, marketers have well-developed “psychographic” categories that they use to target advertising, and pollsters segment the electorate and tailor candidates’ messages accordingly.
Excellent articles. I have to agree that people are much more fragmented than they used to be. Nobody seems to really have roots and extended kinship networks any more.
And personality profiling…don’t even get me started. I’m terrified at the thought of being counted among the “soccer moms.”